FireStream 9270 vs GRID K140Q
When comparing FireStream 9270 and GRID K140Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GRID K140Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
GRID K140Q
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GRID K140Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- FireStream 9270 has 23% more power consumption, than GRID K140Q.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K140Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 100 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1818 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 46% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 72% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 900% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GRID K140Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | GK107 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |