GeForce 920M vs GRID K140Q
When comparing GeForce 920M and GRID K140Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920M and GRID K140Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920M | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 293% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K140Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M and GRID K140Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 104 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce 920M and GRID K140Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920M is 18 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 800% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920M and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 920M and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920M | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N16V-GM-S | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |