GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GRID K140Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GRID K140Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GRID K140Q.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GRID K140Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- GRID K140Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 680 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1040% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 1850% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 250% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 194% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 1650% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 627% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 1228% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 7100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4800% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 94% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |