GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GRID K140Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GRID K140Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q stacks up against GRID K140Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K140Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GRID K140Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 160% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 185 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 8218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 194% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 581% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4450% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GRID K140Q | |
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GK107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- GRID K140Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GRID K140Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GRID K160Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
- GRID K140Q vs GRID K160Q
- GRID K140Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680