GeForce GTX 670M vs GRID K140Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670M and GRID K140Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670M will be the best choice, for others GRID K140Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K140Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 252 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K140Q is 282 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 66% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 242% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 950% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |