GeForce GTX 880M vs GRID K140Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K140Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 880M will be the best choice, for others GRID K140Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K140Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K140Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 104 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K140Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 183% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 166% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 345% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2450% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N15E-GX-A2 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |