GeForce MX150 vs GRID K140Q
When choosing between GeForce MX150 and GRID K140Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX150 and GRID K140Q.
GRID K140Q
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 1200% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX150 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 618 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4226 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 575% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 195% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G1 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 May 2017 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |