GRID K140Q vs GRID M10 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K140Q and GRID M10 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K140Q stacks up against GRID M10 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K140Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GRID M10 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K140Q | GRID M10 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID M10 8Q has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K140Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M10 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 183 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3418 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 625% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 112% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 218% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K140Q | GRID M10 8Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK107 | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |