GRID K140Q vs Iris Graphics 6100
In this comparison between GRID K140Q and Iris Graphics 6100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 6100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 50% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 24% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 18% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 700% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 550% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GK107 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 52.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |