GRID K140Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When choosing between GRID K140Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K140Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID K140Q
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GRID K140Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 31 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 46% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 90% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 185% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1200% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 750% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K140Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K140Q vs GRID K160Q
- GRID K140Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GRID K160Q
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
- GRID K140Q vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- GRID K140Q vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M