GRID K140Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

When comparing GRID K140Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K140Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K140Q

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K140Q	Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	45 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type	DDR3	eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	128 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K140Q has 188% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	21−24
medium / 1080p	1−2	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	30−35
medium / 1080p	2−3	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	100−110	160−170
medium / 768p	75−80	130−140
ultra / 1080p	30−33	65−70
QHD / 1440p	−	35−40
4K / 2160p	9−10	27−30
high / 768p	50−55	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	24−27
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
GRID K140Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	6−7	24−27
medium / 1080p	1−2	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	40−45	70−75
medium / 1080p	2−3	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	10−12	30−35
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 257% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	35−40	60−65
medium / 768p	−	55−60
high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	8−9
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
high / 1080p	50−55	95−100
ultra / 1080p	−	85−90
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 44% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 56% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1600% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	3−4	30−35
medium / 768p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	1−2	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1000% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	50−55
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
high / 768p	24−27	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K140Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K140Q	Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name	GK107	Haswell GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	5 June 2013
Pipelines	192	40
Core clock speed	850 MHz	200 MHz
Boost Clock		1300 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	392 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	52.00
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	104.0 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.80
CUDA	3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K140Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares