GRID K140Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K140Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K140Q stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 580, check out specs charts below.
GRID K140Q
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 63 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K140Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 257% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 38% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 950% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GK107 | Skylake GT4e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 72 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |