GRID K140Q vs Quadro CX
When comparing GRID K140Q and Quadro CX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K140Q and Quadro CX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
Quadro CX
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro CX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro CX has 15% more power consumption, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1535 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 248 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K140Q is 182 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K140Q and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 17% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 27% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro CX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 1.3 |