GRID K140Q vs Quadro FX 4800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K140Q and Quadro FX 4800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K140Q and Quadro FX 4800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K140Q
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 15% more power consumption, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1535 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 248 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K140Q is 182 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 40% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 24% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 1.3 |