GRID K140Q vs Quadro M2000

In this comparison between GRID K140Q and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K140Q

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K140Q	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K140Q has 73% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 54 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
GRID K140Q and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4830 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	9−10	40−45
medium / 1080p	1−2	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	1−2	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	2−3	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K140Q and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	230−240
medium / 768p	75−80	200−210
ultra / 1080p	30−33	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	90−95
4K / 2160p	9−10	50−55
high / 768p	50−55	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 187% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	35−40	100−110
ultra / 1080p	12−14	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 166% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	6−7	50−55
medium / 1080p	1−2	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	120−130
medium / 1080p	2−3	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 345% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	10−12	70−75
medium / 1080p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 714% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	35−40	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K140Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	3−4	75−80
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	1−2	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2450% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	40−45
high / 768p	24−27	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K140Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K140Q	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK107	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	8 April 2016
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	850 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	55.82
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length		201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

GRID K140Q vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares