GRID K140Q vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between GRID K140Q and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 136% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 188 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 165% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 153% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 800% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 313% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 614% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK107 | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |