GRID K140Q vs Quadro T2000 mobile
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K140Q and Quadro T2000 mobile. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K140Q and Quadro T2000 mobile. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K140Q
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 116% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 mobile - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 725 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 6218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K140Q and Quadro T2000 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GRID K140Q and Quadro T2000 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 194% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 581% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4450% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | GK107 | N19P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 114.2 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 7.5 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |