GRID K140Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When comparing GRID K140Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K140Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 73% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 618 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 680% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 1150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K140Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 205% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GRID K140Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 179% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 390% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 785% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 210% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 137% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2850% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 91% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
| Code name | GK107 | Vega Mobile |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 November 2018 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 76.16 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |