GRID K140Q vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When comparing GRID K140Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K140Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 232 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 625% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 218% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 26 September 2019 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 41.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |