GRID K140Q vs Radeon R8 M535DX
When comparing GRID K140Q and Radeon R8 M535DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K140Q and Radeon R8 M535DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
Radeon R8 M535DX
Main Specs
GRID K140Q | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M535DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 70 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M535DX.
- GRID K140Q and Radeon R8 M535DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 800% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K140Q and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K140Q and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. |
Full Specs
GRID K140Q | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Meso |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 18 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 891 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 17.82 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |