GRID K140Q vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between GRID K140Q and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 136% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 440% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K140Q and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 148% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 277% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2000% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 66.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |