GRID K140Q vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K140Q and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K140Q stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K140Q
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1350 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 81% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 128% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 700% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK107 | GF100 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |