FirePro M4000 vs GRID K160Q
When comparing FirePro M4000 and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4000 and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 293% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4000 and GRID K160Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 250 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2718 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 108% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 214% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 533% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GK107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |