FirePro M4100 vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between FirePro M4100 and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4100 will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4100 | GRID K160Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4100 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 180 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 2218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Fortnite is 39% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | − |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4100 | GRID K160Q | |
Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
Code name | Mars | GK107 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |