FirePro M4150 vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4150 and GRID K160Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 135 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 34% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 24% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | GK107 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |