FirePro M6100 vs GRID K160Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M6100 and GRID K160Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M6100 and GRID K160Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6100 | GRID K160Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M6100 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 250 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- FirePro M6100 and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Fortnite is 147% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 314% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1800% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6100 | GRID K160Q | |
Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
Code name | Bonaire | GK107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |