FirePro M7740 vs GRID K160Q
When comparing FirePro M7740 and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M7740 and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 116% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M7740 and GRID K160Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 782 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 82% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 185% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 31% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 466% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Kepler |
| Code name | RV740 | GK107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |