FirePro S7150 vs GRID K160Q
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and GRID K160Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and GRID K160Q.
FirePro S7150
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | GRID K160Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro S7150 has 15% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7150 has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 70 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- FirePro S7150 and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7150 and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S7150 and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | GRID K160Q | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | GK107 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |