FirePro W9000 vs GRID K160Q

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W9000 and GRID K160Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W9000 stacks up against GRID K160Q, check out specs charts below.

FirePro W9000 Check Price

GRID K160Q

Main Specs

	FirePro W9000	GRID K160Q
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	130 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro W9000 has 169% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W9000 has 5 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 125 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
FirePro W9000 and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 3718 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	0−1
ultra / 1080p	21−24	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	9−10
medium / 1080p	40−45	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	1−2
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	8−9
medium / 1080p	60−65	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W9000 and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	100−110
medium / 768p	220−230	75−80
ultra / 1080p	180−190	30−35
QHD / 1440p	110−120	−
4K / 2160p	70−75	9−10
high / 768p	210−220	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
FirePro W9000 and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	65−70
medium / 768p	110−120	35−40
ultra / 1080p	100−110	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	45−50	0−1
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	0−1
low / 720p	80−85	6−7
medium / 1080p	45−50	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	27−30	0−1
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	40−45
medium / 1080p	110−120	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	0−1
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	0−1
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	10−12
medium / 1080p	65−70	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	140−150	35−40
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	0−1
ultra / 1080p	30−35	−
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	0−1
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	0−1
medium / 1080p	30−35	−
low / 768p	130−140	85−90
high / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	120−130	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	21−24
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	1−2
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	130−140	3−4
medium / 768p	85−90	−
high / 1080p	45−50	2−3
ultra / 1080p	24−27	−
4K / 2160p	16−18	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	90−95	65−70
medium / 768p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	50−55	10−11
high / 768p	60−65	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	FirePro W9000	GRID K160Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tahiti	GK107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	28 June 2013
Pipelines	2048	192
Core clock speed	975 MHz	850 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	124.8	13.60
Floating-point performance	3,994 gflops	326.4 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	460 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro W9000 vs GRID K160Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares