FireStream 9370 vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FireStream 9370 has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 25 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2818 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 625% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 107% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 191% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 966% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Cypress | GK107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |