GeForce 820A vs GRID K160Q
When choosing between GeForce 820A and GRID K160Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 820A and GRID K160Q.
GeForce 820A
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q has 766% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 820A and GRID K160Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 75 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A is 18 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 800% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 820A and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GF117 | GK107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 3.0 |