GeForce 825M vs GRID K160Q
When comparing GeForce 825M and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 825M | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 293% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 825M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M and GRID K160Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GeForce 825M and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 825M is 18 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Dota 2 is 44% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 80% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 825M | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |