GeForce 920MX vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce 920MX and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920MX will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 712% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920MX has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 115 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce 920MX and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 18 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Fortnite is 39% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |