GeForce 940MX vs GRID K160Q
When comparing GeForce 940MX and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 940MX and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 465% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940MX has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 272 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce 940MX and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 2218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Fortnite is 91% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 466% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |