GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800M GT SLI will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 130 Watt.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 511 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 350 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 982 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Fortnite is 65% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Code name | NB9E-GT2 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |