GeForce GT 640M LE vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce GT 640M LE and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 640M LE will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GT 640M LE is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M LE is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M LE here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 640M LE | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 550% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 640M LE has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is build with Fermi / Kepler architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- GeForce GT 640M LE and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 640M LE is 18 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 800% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 640M LE and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GT 640M LE and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 640M LE | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi / Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13P-LP | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | Up to 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 14 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |