GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | GRID K160Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is 149 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is 5218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | − |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 183% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Dota 2 is 160% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Fortnite is 326% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1533% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | GRID K160Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | N17P-G0 Max-Q | GK107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2018 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 999 - 1189 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1139 - 1328 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 53.12 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |