GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GRID K160Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID K160Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against GRID K160Q, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 15% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID K160Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 450 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 82 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 126% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1800% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | GF104 | GK107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |