GeForce GTX 670MX vs GRID K160Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K160Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K160Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 382 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Dota 2 is 62% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Fortnite is 126% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 242% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Minecraft is 38% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GR | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |