GeForce GTX 680MX vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680MX and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680MX will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 680MX | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and GRID K160Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 130 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 718 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 1100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 680MX and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 167% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 975% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 360% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 714% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 131% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 680MX | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK107 | |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3540 Million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| 3D Vision | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |