GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M SLI will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 860M SLI | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 8% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 179 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 1150% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 860M SLI and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 172% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 369% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 757% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 100−105 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 210% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 131% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 860M SLI | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GK107 | |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2x 1870 Million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |