GeForce MX250 vs GRID K160Q
When choosing between GeForce MX250 and GRID K160Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX250 and GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX250 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 1200% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 668 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 5218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 625% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 107% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 966% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX250 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G2 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |