GeForce MX330 vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce MX330 and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX330 will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX330 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 1200% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX330 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 681 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 5218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Dota 2 is 115% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1033% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX330 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |