GeForce MX450 vs GRID K160Q
When comparing GeForce MX450 and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX450 and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX450 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 160% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX450 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 545 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 8220 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 142% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 282% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 571% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX450 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 August 2020 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |