GRID K160Q vs GRID K260Q
When choosing between GRID K160Q and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and GRID K260Q.
GRID K160Q
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K160Q and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 143% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 226% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 471% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 135% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 112% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2700% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1166% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK104 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |