GRID K160Q vs GRID K520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K160Q and GRID K520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K160Q stacks up against GRID K520, check out specs charts below.
GRID K160Q
GRID K520
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K520 has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K160Q and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 132% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 252% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1266% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 91% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK107 | GK104 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |