GRID K160Q vs GRID M60 1Q
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and GRID M60 1Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 1Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GRID M60 1Q
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | GRID M60 1Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID M60 1Q has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K160Q and GRID M60 1Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 293 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID K160Q and GRID M60 1Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 3230 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 1075% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K160Q and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 100−105 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 167% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 975% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 360% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 714% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 131% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | GRID M60 1Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |