GRID K160Q vs GRID M60 2Q
When comparing GRID K160Q and GRID M60 2Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and GRID M60 2Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
GRID M60 2Q
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID M60 2Q has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M60 2Q has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 293 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID K160Q and GRID M60 2Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 3230 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K160Q and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GRID K160Q and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |