GRID K160Q vs HD Graphics 5000
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and HD Graphics 5000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 5000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 333% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5000 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5000 - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics 5000 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 650 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5000 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| GRID K160Q and HD Graphics 5000 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Fortnite is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GRID K160Q and HD Graphics 5000 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Minecraft is 21% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and HD Graphics 5000 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| GRID K160Q and HD Graphics 5000 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GK107 | Haswell GT3 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 44.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |