GRID K160Q vs Iris Graphics 540
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Iris Graphics 540, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Iris Graphics 540.
GRID K160Q
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 63 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K160Q and Iris Graphics 540 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 126% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 242% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 38% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GK107 | Skylake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |